![]() ![]() But I didn't make the rig for monetary reasons anyways. I shot and scanned about 30 rolls over the course of the year so if I shoot another 30 then I will have broken even versus the flat $10-a-roll fee the lab charges. Testing out the Shorts feature on YouTube for the first time and taking you behind the scenes as I scan the film from one of my most recent projects, using. That plus $100 for NLP, and a free beseler enlarger to convert into a light rig, and I had my desired scans. I found a Canon 6D for $400 and bought that instead (because its a lot handier than just a scanner). The cheapest passable scanner I was looking at was the Optek 8000 and it was $300 on ebay. But converting them in Negative Lab Pro, cropping, and adjusting the photos takes the same amount of time as doing it in the Epson scanning app. of people are using Negative Lab Pro that is a plugin for LightRoom. The dedicated equipment is old and expensive. So I attempted a standard negative scan instead of a positive conversion to try and. I pride myself on being as thrifty & diy as possible, and even then it cost me $525 to get a rig that rivaled by lab's scans. But if there’s one piece of equipment that is the most important, it’s the Macro lens. Epson FastFoto FF-640 High-Speed Photo Scanner (B11B246201) NEW OPEN BOX. Epson Perfection V750 Pro Scanner - plus negative holders. According to Nate, most bad results come down to the negative scanning setup. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Epson FastFoto FF-680W Scanner at the best online prices at eBay. The macro lens is the most important part of the DSLR film scanning setup. Getting a scanning rig going is simply expensive. Ribsy’s video made from our chat with Nate from Negative Lab Pro. I could even run them through NLP if you're really curious. The DVD-lab PRO version 2 is a next step in DVD authoring for advanced users who need accessible and easy to learn tool with full range of DVD features. ![]() If you're curious, I can find & show you what the raw 35mm scans look like. The resolution of both flatbeds was just awful, both having a lot of noise and a pathetically low amount of contrast. Didn't have a Epson, but my best efforts to scan 35mm with the similar Canon 8800f and the HP G4050 were both very inferior to my first attempts at a DSLR scan, which was a Canon t5i with a $25 macro lens held over an old android tablet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |